The Latest…
By Nellie
I am currently in the midst of reading an engrossing novel regarding food and the yo-yo crisis we find ourselves in when it comes to our health. In Defense of Food (An Eater’s Manifesto) by Michael Pollan, is an insightful book which talks about how we as eaters, barely consume “real” food, instead consuming “foodie like substances”. It’s a hard thing to look at your daily diet and asses what is actually true “food”. Ideally we would eat fruits and vegetables, a little meat and just enough to keep us going.
Hard as this is these days, we tend to eat for bonding, to reduce stress, a reflex for boredom, etc. Food has found its way into our lives not just as to function, but as entertainment, amusement and worst case scenario: addiction. The book doesn’t break much ground in the sense that it asks us to follow a few simple rules, but it’s huge in the sense that it asks us to *remember* these same ’simple rules’. To “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.” It’s polite attempt to question the reality of food urges you to identify what it is you are actually eating and why, and to inquire whether or not this is actually considered ”food”.
Pollan’s book recalls recent health studies, trends, the relations between the food industry, marketing campaigns, crop growers and a nation looking for someone to tell them what to eat next. It all comes down to being beneficial for everyone, except the eater. The beginning of the book presents us with an idea that lingers: newer studies actually suggest that everything we are told about diet and discoveries regarding health, potentially lead us nowhere and could perhaps mean absolutely nothing. Such research easily changes with every different person who reviews it, alters by who is paying whom to research it, and is encouraged as an adopted lifestyle change by those poised to profit. Then, only by trickle-down effect leads to a society just brimming with eager buyers who long to embrace it; for the answers are the stuff of dieter’s dreams.
Our country happens to have an alarming amount of obesity and in a place where so much emphasis is placed on weight, image, less fat more carbs, I find this all very depressing. Shifting trends in what is ‘right’ to eat, only shifts around the weight of the problem: we inherently know what we *should* be eating, but have yet to find our way back to the source. As idealistic as this novel appears; the fact that it could pave the way for a better future for everyone, rests on it being only as good as the number of people who believe in it. (To which I may add, the number is perhaps quite high considering the popularity of this book.)
So, why do you eat the things you eat? Who is telling you what to eat, why to diet and what is good for *your* body? It’s hard enough to try and manage life, why should diet be something that is any easier? This is what we are continuously told and eventually come to believe. Low-fat, less carbs, now made with _______, new and improved, these are all claims to make life ‘easier’ and maximize your health. Really though… the fine print screams “not-real food” and “altered from original composition”, two results of ’nutrionism’ and a major movement called ‘food science’.
It doesn’t have to be this difficult though in choosing food! I think where the book is going, is to guide you more to follow your instincts instead of following a trail of ‘inedible’ crumbs. To not be so quick to digest the advice from the health industry experts, but to rely more from the sustenance of Momma Earth than from the labels on the boxes of ‘jacked’ up foods; to veer more towards the farmer’s market than to the frozen food aisle, to keep it ‘real’ so to speak. We already know all this though. Right? Question to ask yourself.
Happy Eating!
PS: This post is fully based on *my own opinion* and is not after full completion of said book.
Read more: Previous Posts By Title
